How to Compute Direct Materials Variances

Premium Furniture, a US based Inc., uses a standard costing system to control its direct materials and conversion costs. During the month of December 2022, its workers used 3,750 feet of timber to finish 1,500 office chairs. The standard length of timber allowed to manufacture an office chair is 2.75 feet and the standard rate per foot of timber is $3.50. How much is the direct materials quantity variance of Prime Furniture Inc. for the month of December 2022? It makes sense to use the material quantity variance when a company wants to monitor and improve the efficiency of its production process. This analysis is particularly useful in manufacturing environments where standard material usage levels are well established and consistent.

Direct Materials Quantity Variance

As a result of this favorable outcome information, the company may consider continuing operations as they exist, or could change future budget projections to reflect higher profit margins, among other things. In this case, the actual quantity of materials used is \(0.20\) pounds, the standard price per unit of materials is \(\$7.00\), and the standard quantity used is \(0.25\) pounds. The actual cost less the actual quantity at standard price equals the direct materials price variance. The difference between the actual quantity at standard price and the standard cost is the direct materials quantity variance.

A positive material quantity variance indicates that the actual quantity of materials used in production is less than the standard quantity. This outcome is often seen as favourable since it suggests that the company has used fewer materials than expected to achieve the same output level. It implies efficient material usage, leading to cost savings and improved profitability.

Sometimes, they use more or less of these materials than they thought. This can happen for various reasons, like mistakes, changes in how things get produced, or even the quality of the materials. Companies must determine why differences exist in material use, which can come from material quantity variance. The material quantity variance is also known as the material usage variance and the material yield variance.

  • The difference between the actual quantity at standard price and the standard cost is the direct materials quantity variance.
  • The direct materials quantity variance should be investigated and used in a way that does not spoil the motivation of workers and supervisors at work place.
  • By showing the total materials variance as the sum of the two components, management can better analyze the two variances and enhance decision-making.
  • If the actual price paid per unit of material is lower than the standard price per unit, the variance will be a favorable variance.
  • Unearthing the root causes allows them to make informed decisions, initiate corrective measures, and optimize material utilization practices.
  • There are two components to a direct materials variance, the direct materials price variance and the direct materials quantity variance, which both compare the actual price or amount used to the standard amount.

An unfavorable outcome means the actual costs related to materials were more than the expected (standard) costs. If the outcome is a favorable outcome, this means the actual costs related to materials are less than the expected (standard) costs. Green Co. established a benchmark standard of utilizing 10 units for every product. However, during a recent production cycle, the actual material consumption per unit amounted to 9.

This variance from the standard quantity prompted an exploration of the material quantity variance. Use the following information to calculate direct material quantity variance. Watch this video featuring a professor of accounting walking through the steps involved in calculating a material price variance and a material quantity variance to learn more. It is the difference between the standard cost for actual output and the standard cost of actual quantity of materials used.

Generally, production department is responsible to see that material usage is kept in line with standards. However, purchasing department may be responsible for unfavorable materials quantity variance if it is caused by poor quality of materials. If purchasing department obtains inferior quality materials in effort to economize on price, the materials may be unsuitable for use and may result in excessive waste. Thus purchasing department rather than production department would be responsible for the quantity or usage variance. If the actual price paid per unit of material is lower than the standard price per unit, the variance will be a favorable variance.

Recalculating Standards

In this case, the actual quantity of materials used is 0.50 pounds, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the standard quantity used is 0.25 pounds. This is an unfavorable outcome because the actual quantity of work in process inventory example materials used was more than the standard quantity expected at the actual production output level. As a result of this unfavorable outcome information, the company may consider retraining workers to reduce waste or change their production process to decrease materials needs per box.

Analyzing a Favorable DM Quantity Variance

A favorable outcome means you spent less on the purchase of materials than you anticipated. If, however, the actual price paid per unit of material is greater than the standard price per unit, the variance will be unfavorable. An unfavorable outcome means you spent more on the purchase of materials than you anticipated. In this case, the production department performed efficiently and saved 40 units of direct material. Multiplying this by the standard price per unit yields a favorable direct material quantity variance of $160.

Favorable or unfavorable variance

  • In this case, the actual price per unit of materials is $6.00, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the actual quantity used is 0.25 pounds.
  • The material quantity variance is also known as the material usage variance and the material yield variance.
  • A company can compute these materials variances and, from these calculations, can interpret the results and decide how to address these differences.
  • Therefore, if the theater sells 300 bags of popcorn with two tablespoons of butter on each, the total amount of butter that should be used is 600 tablespoons.

A material quantity variance of zero means the company uses the same quantity of materials as its established standards. However, that is rarely the case as this variance might be above or below zero. In other words, if the business has consumed fewer materials to produce a given level of output than expected, the material 1 15 closing entries financial and managerial accounting quantity variance is said to be favorable. When companies make things, they use different materials like ingredients in a recipe.

4: Compute and Evaluate Materials Variances

Where there are two or more materials being used, formulae containing the expression AQ × SP should not be used for calculating the variance for the mix. The MQV should be favorable because the standard quantity of the fabric for making 10,000 shirts is 28,000 meters which is less than what was actually used (30,000 meters). The first step in the calculation is to figure out how much stuffing material should be used to manufacture 9000 teddy bears (standard quantity). Mark P. Holtzman, PhD, CPA, is Chair of the Department of Accounting and Taxation at Seton Hall University. He has taught accounting at the college level for 17 years and runs the Accountinator website at , which gives practical accounting advice to entrepreneurs.

Figure 8.3 shows the connection between the direct materials price variance and direct materials quantity variance to total direct materials cost variance. Generally, the production managers are considered responsible for direct materials quantity variance because they are the persons responsible for keeping a check on excessive usage of production inputs. However, purchase managers may purchase low quality, substandard or otherwise unfit materials with an intention to improve direct materials price variance.

How to calculate the Material Quantity Variance?

In this case, the actual price per unit of materials is $6.00, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the actual quantity purchased is 20 pounds. This is a favorable outcome because the actual price for materials was less than the standard price. If the actual quantity used is greater than the standard quantity, the variance is unfavorable. This means that the company has used excessive materials in producing its output. In this case, the actual price per unit of materials is $9.00, the standard price per unit of materials is $7.00, and the actual quantity used is 0.25 pounds.

Variances occur in most of the manufacturing processes and for almost all cost elements. The ultimate motive behind their calculation is to control costs and enhance improvement. Each bottle has a standard material cost of 8 ounces at $0.85 per ounce. Calculate the material price variance and the material quantity variance. To apply this method to the Band Book example, take a look at the next diagram. Direct materials actually cost $297,000, even though the standard cost of the direct materials is only $289,800.

During a particular production period, the organisation has utilised 2,800 kgs of X purchased @ 12/kg, 2,100 kgs of Y purchased @ 11/kg and 800 kgs of Z purchased @ 16/kg for manufacture. Excessive usage of materials can result from many reasons, including faulty machines, inferior quality of materials, untrained workers, poor supervision and theft of materials. By taking both prices at standard we are eliminating the effect of difference between the standard price and actual price, thereby leaving only the difference between usage quantities. Now that we know the standard quantity, we can use the DMQV formula to calculate the variance. During a period, the Teddy Bear Company used 15,000 kilograms of stuffing material to produce 9000 teddy bears. The company had paid an average price of $1.5 per kilogram of stuffing material.

The standard quantity of 19,200 is computed by multiplying the standard quantity per unit of 2kgs. It means that following the standard quantity, the company should have used 19,200 kgs. The actual quantity used can differ from the standard quantity because of improved efficiencies in production, carelessness or inefficiencies in production, or poor estimation when creating the standard usage. The above material quantity variance formula has the following components. You can check this video of mine for more examples of the material quantity variance.

With either of these formulas, the actual quantity used refers to the actual amount of materials used at the actual production output. The standard quantity is the expected amount of materials used at the actual production output. If there is no difference between the actual quantity used what is prepaid rent its importance in the accounting sphere and the standard quantity, the outcome will be zero, and no variance exists.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *